The American political system is that of liberal democracy. There is an inherent distrust of a large standing army by the American people. Because of this, there has been considerable friction between political and military leaders on how best to integrate the military in the national security decision making process during peace and war. Prior to WWII, the question was solved during peace by not having a standing army. Then during war, a successful balance was struck which integrated political and military viewpoints to form national security policy. However, the Cold War upset the balance as the political viewpoint expanded and eventually suffocated the military viewpoint from the national security policy making process. This political enlargement resulted in a military detached from the national security decision process during the Vietnam War. The outcome war a political-military integration failure and a debacle in Vietnam. In the two decades following the Vietnam War, both political and military policy making viewpoints acheived a unique balance. The balance was attained by several political and military corrections to make sure there was \"never again\" another Vietnam. The manifestation of military-political balance was the 1991 Persian Gulf War. With the end of the Cold War, the changed political viewpoint, the US must again find the appropriate balance of political-military viewpoints in the national security policy making process. To find the right balance a glance at past failure and success can give insight into how the appropriate military-political balance can be realized and maintained. | Political Military Integration by Jay H Lindell, Paperback | Indigo Chapters